[doap-interest] doap:revision, sorting and version number notations

[Josh Sled]

On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 05:40, balbinus wrote:

> Another problem will be with alphas, betas and release candidates (a, b,
> rc)... Still the problem of standardization.

Time is pretty standardized; I'd encourage...

[[[

doap:releaseDate a rdf:Property
; rdfs:comment "When a particular release was made."@en
; rdfs:label "Version release date+time."@en
; rdfs:domain doap:Version;
; rdfs:range xsd:datetime
.

doap: a owl:Ontology
; rdfs:subPropertyOf
  [ a owl:Restriction
  ; owl:onProperty doap:releaseDate
  ; owl:cardinality 1 ]
.
]]]

Speaking of time, is there any reason that doap:created isn't
rdfs:range'ed to xsd:date?   In fact ... could it be dropped in favor of
dc:created?

...jsled

-- 
http://www.asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}`