[doap-interest] :maintains, :translates, etc.
rich.boakes at port.ac.uk
Fri Jul 30 09:37:27 BST 2004
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> I know that DOAP is attempting to be small/lightweight,
> and more oriented towards describing projects than the
> relationships therein, but it seems to me that creating
> these inverses is relatively trivial, as well as being
> pretty useful in terms of creating browsable data.
I was wondering about the same additions myself over the
last few days and keeping DOAP unpolluted makes sense.
Using a separate schema for modeling temporal reification
would seem like a good route since both current (and IMO
more importantly) historical relationships could be modeled
using the same mechanism.
<rdf:subject rdf:resource="X" />
<rdf:type rdf:resource="Y" />
<rdf:object rdf:resource="Z" />
<???:period rdf:resource="#when1" />
[* note ??? namespace.]
/me wonders about having the content automatically generated
based on CVS activity :-)
More information about the doap-interest