[doap-interest] ScutterSnacks, ProjectProfileDocument?
Danny Ayers
danny.ayers at gmail.com
Sun Nov 14 15:40:22 GMT 2004
Yep, I agree, having <Project> on the outside is much nicer. Hadn't
thought of that.
Dave and Benjamin's suggestions seem fairly close:
<Project>
<!-- ... existing stuff ... -->
<isPrimaryTopicOf>
<ProjectProfile>
</ProjectProfile>
</isPrimaryTopicOf>
</Project>
-------------------------------------
> <doap:Project>
> <doap:ppd rdf:resource="http://www.example.com/doap.rdf"/>
> </doap:Project>
>
> a doap:ppd (or doap:profile) would be inverseFunctional.
-------------------------------------
You could have a combined version:
<doap:Project>
<doap:isPrimaryTopicOf rdf:resource=""/>
...
</doap:Project>
helpful stuff could go in the schema, either say:
<rdf:Property rdf:about="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#isPrimaryTopicOf">
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#Project" />
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Document" />
</rdf:Property>
or swap the range for doap:ProjectDocument, and define that as a
rdfs:Class as well, while leaving the instance doc syntax just the
same.
Maybe...
Cheers,
Danny.
--
http://dannyayers.com
More information about the doap-interest
mailing list