[doap-interest] Some new terms for your consideration

[Sergio Fernández]

> > Perhaps there is another ontology that already model folksonomies.
> >
> 
> Perhaps! If one comes to light we can amend the schema to indicate  
> the equivalence.

For example SIOC has a class [1] for this, but I think it is not used.
Also it exists another ontology [2] that model folksonomies, but the
project hasn't had much activity since 2005. 

It's a difficult topic. Thomas Gruber wrote a great paper [3] about it.

> > The range could be sioc:Forum (or sioc:Weblog), instead of a
> > Resource. But we have to decide what the meaning of this property,
> > because it could be enough to use rdfs:seeAlso as Stuart Yeates said.
> 
> I'll take a look at the SIOC terms thanks.

Just ask.

> seeAlso isn't enough for  
> me, as I think it ought to be possible to determine it's a blog from  
> the DOAP file, so things like Planet sites can be made.

Yes, rdfs:seeAlso has a poor semantic relationship if you ever want to
link blogs or planets. Then I think that the better option could be
sioc:Forum as range.

Best regards,

[1] http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#Tag
[2] http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/tags/
[3] http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm
[4] http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#Forum

-- 
__      ___ _   _           
\ \    / (_) |_(_)___ _ _   
 \ \/\/ /| | / / / -_) '_|  Sergio Fernández
  \_/\_/ |_|_\_\_\___|_|    http://www.wikier.org/