[doap-interest] Fwd: Call for Review: EARL 1.0 Last Call Working Draft
Shadi Abou-Zahra
shadi at w3.org
Wed May 11 15:18:29 CEST 2011
Apologies for cross posting, I believe this may be interesting for
people interested in RDF vocabularies.
Regards,
Shadi
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Call for Review: EARL 1.0 Last Call Working Draft
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:15:59 +0000
Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig at w3.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:12:54 -0500
From: Shawn Henry <shawn at w3.org>
To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig at w3.org>
Dear WAI Interest Group (IG) Participants,
WAI invites you to comment on the Last Call Working Draft of EARL and
related documents published 10 May 2011:
* Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema - Last Call
Working Draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
* Developer Guide for Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 -
updated Working Draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Guide/
* HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 - updated Working Draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/
* Representing Content in RDF 1.0 - updated Working Draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF10/
* Pointer Methods in RDF 1.0 - updated Working Draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/Pointers-in-RDF10/
EARL provides a way to combine results from different web accessibility
evaluation tools, and to share results between tools. For example, with
EARL an authoring tool can get accessibility information from an
evaluation tool. EARL is a machine-readable format for expressing test
results in a vendor-neutral and platform-independent format. It is
introduced in:
EARL Overview
http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/earl
WAI encourages feedback from developers and researchers who are
interested in software-supported evaluation and validation of websites,
and by those who are interested in Semantic Web technologies for content
description, annotation, and adaptation. Please send comments to the
publicly-archived list:
public-earl10-comments at w3.org
by *10 June 2011*
Status of documents:
EARL 1.0 Schema is intended to become a W3C Recommendation. The other
four documents are currently planned to become W3C Notes. The difference
between W3C Recommendations and W3C Notes -- and Last Call, Candidate
Recommendation, and other development stages -- is described in:
How WAI Develops Accessibility Guidelines through the W3C Process
http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process
The Working Group believes is has addressed all comments received so far
and is looking for feedback, especially on EARL 1.0 Schema before it
progresses to Candidate Recommendation Working Draft. The "Status of
this Document" sections of the publications include specific questions
and guidance for providing comments.
Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you in advance for
your comments.
Feel free to circulate this message to other lists; please avoid
cross-postings where possible.
Short URI to this archived e-mail: http://bit.ly/earl20115
Regards,
~Shawn Henry, WAI Outreach
Shadi Abou-Zahra, ERT Chair
-----
Shawn Lawton Henry
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
e-mail: shawn at w3.org
phone: +1.617.395.7664
about: http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/
More information about the doap-interest
mailing list