Fw: [rdfweb-dev] Proposal: Names in FoaF

[Jason Bell]

It was something that was in the back of my mind, why not include the vCard
namespace within your foaffile and use that as well.  Better definition of
data and in a format that could be easily forward or reverse engineered.

For the basic foaf file then what is in place, in my eyes is okay.

 Just my two penneth.
Jase Bell
--
Jason Bell
J2SE Editor - Java Developers Journal
e: jasonbell at sys-con.com


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Abiad" <chris at ambientvector.com>
> To: <rdfweb-dev at vapours.rdfweb.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [rdfweb-dev] Proposal: Names in FoaF
>
>
> > Forgive me if this is a hugely ignorant comment, but
> > hasn't the problem of solving how to represent names
> > in a standard way already been solved?
> >
> > It strikes me that Palm Address Book, Ximian
> > Evolution, and many others seem to handle name entry
> > in a clean, standardized way.  Why is the vCard spec's
> > definition of a name not suitable for FOAF?
> >
> >
>
http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Data_Formats/Document/Contact/vCar
> d/
> >
> > --
> > Christopher Abiad <chris at ambientvector.com>
> > Founder, ambientVector
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rdfweb-dev mailing list
> > rdfweb-dev at vapours.rdfweb.org
> > http://rdfweb.org/mailman/listinfo/rdfweb-dev
> >
>