[rdfweb-dev] Serious question about silly attributes

[Danny Ayers]

As a dictionary of RDF
> terms, it's still quite a slim beast compared to, say, Wordnet (50,000
> terms) or TAP (http://tap.stanford.edu/tap/tapkb.html several 1000).

Heh, quite.

> Naming is probably the most tricky decision facing us: some folks want
> to be able to round-trip through LDAP/LDIF/vCard, while others would
> rather postpone detailed naming vocab to a separate namespace. I'm
> currently sat on the fence...

It is such a comfy fence.

I wonder if there's another way of using the status vocab, as a kind of
trivial profiling - FOAF core is the subset of FOAF that has status
"stable". Kind of inferable sub-vocabulary.
The stable term list can't be that far off what Jason's suggesting..?