[foaf-dev] Re: Social Networks that use FOAF
Dom Ramsey
dom at dynamite.co.uk
Mon Mar 24 22:19:47 GMT 2008
On 24 Mar 2008, at 22:03, Michael Wechner wrote:
> Dom Ramsey wrote:
>>
>> In fact, in my experience, most users who understand the
>> implications of FOAF would rather *not* have it. There are simply
>> too many privacy concerns and it's way too easy for a site to make
>> false assertions about its users (just because I added you to my
>> "favorites" doesn't mean I consider you a friend or even "know"
>> you).
>
>
> I don't think that's the problem of FOAF itself, but rather how it
> is being used
You're quite right.
The problem is, users tend to complain when FOAF is used exactly as
designed.
Dom
More information about the foaf-dev
mailing list