[gnome-bluetooth] Send To

[martin at hyperion.ath.cx]

On Do, 2005-04-21 at 18:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 18:51 +0200, martin at hyperion.ath.cx wrote:
> > On Do, 2005-04-21 at 17:18 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > Because you shouldn't copy private stuff on public mailing-lists, basic
> > > netiquette. Ie. you're not supposed to do what you just did. You got off
> > > light :)
> > 
> > Uhm.. yadayada.. There's nothing "private"...
> 
> Given that there are 2 people involved in the discussion, you can't take
> this decision on your own. That's that.

The discussion went accidently off of the list and the exchanged
information is of absolutely no kind of privacy. It's even more
important to the public, what we discussed.
Leave it or sue me, but this is a really naive way.


> <snip>
> > > I just don't. It actually seems like my phone could support it. I just
> > > filed http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301481 about that.
> > 
> > So, the obex-discussion was useless. Fine.
> > Will the "Send to"-option actually solve it? Seahorse 0.76 had the same
> > problem, so the plugin-mechanism was used to register their own
> > encrypt/sign-options. So a plugin must create its own context and if
> > there's no root-option providing a "Send to" it can also be in the
> > root-context itself.
> > Nautilus never supported obex on its own, did it? So... I wonder, what
> > the sense of this "they are the bad people"-discussion is. Really.
> 
> I don't understand those few paragraphs... What's the "they are bad
> people"-discussion about? I didn't see any of that in the mails from
> this thread.

So, the nautilus send-to context-option is the magic, right?
I think it's not, owing to gnome-bt's original purpose.

What I really missed the last postings is an path on what you are going
to do. It really seemed you made the gnome-developers to scapegoats.

Sorry, but what does your mobile phone have to do with the
nautilus-context?  What is obex' role in this at all? Why does the
"gnome-problem" seem to block the gnome-bt integration?
Seahorse has made it into nautilus by implementing the new mechanism.

What's is the difference to gnome-bt here? What does gnome-bt stop from
being integrated?
I'm not interested in flaming but in answers to my questions.
What's the problem with that?