[doap-interest] :maintains, :translates, etc.

[rich boakes]

Christopher Schmidt wrote:

 > I know that DOAP is attempting to be small/lightweight,
 > and more oriented towards describing projects than the
 > relationships therein, but it seems to me that creating
 > these inverses is relatively trivial, as well as being
 > pretty useful in terms of creating browsable data.

+1

I was wondering about the same additions myself over the 
last few days and keeping DOAP unpolluted makes sense.

Using a separate schema for modeling temporal reification 
would seem like a good route since both current (and IMO 
more importantly) historical relationships could be modeled 
using the same mechanism.

   <relationship>
     <rdf:subject rdf:resource="X" />
     <rdf:type rdf:resource="Y" />
     <rdf:object rdf:resource="Z" />
     <???:period rdf:resource="#when1" />
   </relationship>

   <duration rdf:id="#when1">
     <startDate>#####</startDate>
     <endDate>#####</endDate>
   </duration>

[* note ??? namespace.]


/me wonders about having the content automatically generated 
based on CVS activity :-)

_______________________________________________
rich                                 boakes.org