[doap-interest] Standards

David Reid david at jetnet.co.uk
Thu Aug 23 12:31:08 BST 2007


Edd Dumbill wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2007, at 14:12, David Reid wrote:
> 
>>> 2. I find 'body' too ambiguous. Perhaps 'organization' might work
>>> better?
>>
>> Yep. I see your point, but the usual term is "standards body" isn't it?
> 
> I just find it too close to html:body for comfort, that's all.

That's a very valid point...

Maybe just use the full term then, "standardsBody" ?

That's about as unambiguous as I can think of :-)

david

> 
> -- Edd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> doap-interest mailing list
> doap-interest at lists.gnomehack.com
> http://lists.usefulinc.com/mailman/listinfo/doap-interest
> 
> !DSPAM:16,46cd55e2126702115716646!
> 
> 



More information about the doap-interest mailing list