[doap-interest] Standards
David Reid
david at jetnet.co.uk
Thu Aug 23 12:31:08 BST 2007
Edd Dumbill wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2007, at 14:12, David Reid wrote:
>
>>> 2. I find 'body' too ambiguous. Perhaps 'organization' might work
>>> better?
>>
>> Yep. I see your point, but the usual term is "standards body" isn't it?
>
> I just find it too close to html:body for comfort, that's all.
That's a very valid point...
Maybe just use the full term then, "standardsBody" ?
That's about as unambiguous as I can think of :-)
david
>
> -- Edd
>
> _______________________________________________
> doap-interest mailing list
> doap-interest at lists.gnomehack.com
> http://lists.usefulinc.com/mailman/listinfo/doap-interest
>
> !DSPAM:16,46cd55e2126702115716646!
>
>
More information about the doap-interest
mailing list