[rdfweb-dev] XSLTs for FOAF, Spring v1.3.1 and plans forFOAFspecimprovements

Jim Ley jim at jibbering.com
Fri Jul 25 16:07:36 UTC 2003


"Julian Bond" <julian_bond at voidstar.com>
> >To me your basic viewpoint is one coming from a very constrained view on
> >FOAF based on your use cases, please look to other peoples use cases.
>
> Jim, we seem to be approaching this from orthogonal directions.
> Fundamentally, my thoughts are about the adoption and lifecycle of
> standards. A technically good standard that is hard for average
> programmers to deal with is not going to get wide implementation.

And a technically bad one that because of which you can't do anything
interesting with without inventing your own set of extensions in any
haphazard manner you like is no better, RDF is easy, there's plenty of
toolkits out there, in just about every language.  If your average
programmer can't get to grips with these, I think I can see why so much
software is bad!

> Maybe I'm wrong but my perception is that there's still many
> programming environments that don't have a stable, mature RDF parser.

That perception is just wrong, I have no idea about PHP though.

Jim.




More information about the foaf-dev mailing list